The following text was written in 2008 and originally appeared on the now-defunct Haze Gray and Underway / Canadian Navy of Yesterday and Today website, and much is largely paraphrased and/or excerpted from the RCN Publication Machinery Digest for Destroyer Escorts, 205, 206, 257 and Classes. It should be noted, however, that this document does not make mention whatsoever the failure of the automatic clutch and resulting removal of the cruise turbines, and this information has been obtained from other unofficial sources. All photos are the copyright of the author, unless otherwise noted.
Y100 powerplants were installed in a number of ships in the
Royal and Royal Canadian Navies in the 1950s and 1960s, including the RN's Type
12 and Type 14 frigates, as well as the Cadillacs (ST. LAURENT, RESTIGOUCHE,
MACKENZIE, and ANNAPOLIS class destroyers) of the Royal Canadian Navy. The Y100
plant consisted of two boilers in a single boiler room forward, with two geared
turbines in a single engine room aft. The reduction gearboxes were installed
right in the engine room, just aft of each turbine. The boiler and engine rooms
were separated by a watertight bulkhead. The RN's Type 12 frigates were
arranged similarly to the RCN ships, while the Type 14 frigates only had a
single propeller shaft, and therefore only had a single turbine and reduction
gear set. HMCS ST. LAURENT received an RN type Y100 powerplant with English
Electric turbines (as supplied by Yarrows Ltd), while the rest of the Canadian
ships received a slightly modified powerplant (manufactured in Canada) with
Parsons turbines and a different gearbox.
![]() |
A cross section of a RESTIGOUCHE class destroyer, showing the location of the Boiler Room and the Engine and Gearing Room. Image courtesy of LCDR Roger Heimpel, CFNES Damage Control Division. |
The main propulsion machinery, as designed, consisted of a cruise turbine and a main turbine, of which RCN destroyers had two of each. From between 5% and 30% of full power, the more efficient cruise turbine was connected through the gearbox and provided all forward propulsion. Above 30% of full power, an automatic clutch system disconnected the cruise turbine and engaged the main turbine to provide up to and including 100% of full power. The astern turbine was incorporated at the exhaust end of the main turbine casing. The two-stage main condenser was slung underneath the main turbine.
Power was transferred from the main gearbox to the propeller shaft by the double reduction gearbox. Power from the cruise turbine was transmitted to the main turbine drive gear via the automatic clutch and an additional reduction gear. Both the cruise and main turbines were controlled by a single ahead throttle wheel, and power was transferred automatically by the clutch. Power was transmitted to the hull by the gearbox, which had its own integral thrust block.
In practice, however, the automatic clutch never worked properly, and eventually the cruise turbines were either disconnected or removed in most or all of the RCN ships and probably the RN ones as well. Fortunately, the astern turbine was integral with the main turbine, and the ships were able to operate without the cruise turbine, although presumably with higher fuel consumption. (The author is interested in hearing more about the cruise turbine and why the clutch didn't work, and whether or not the RN experienced the same problems.)
In 1969, HMCS KOOTENAY suffered an explosion in her starboard gearbox while running at full power, an event that killed 9 men. My story on this event appeared in the September and October 2019 issues of Warships IFR magazine.
Machinery Controls
![]() |
The engine room status board, as it appeared on July 11, 1997, the date of TERRA NOVA's final sailpast in Halifax Harbour. |
![]() |
A close-up of the control panel, showing the readouts for the starboard turbine. |
![]() |
The throttle control station looking aft and to starboard. |
![]() |
Looking aft and to starboard at the throttle control station. |
![]() |
The starboard turbine throttle control station looking aft. |
The boiler room was situated athwartships and contained two
Babcock and Wilcox natural circulation, single furnace boilers (integral
furnace, with superheat control) located side-by-side and each with its own
uptake merged into a single funnel; the nine ships that received the DDH
conversion received twin funnels to allow for the installation of a hangar.
Each boiler was of the two-drum, bent-tube type, fitted with double casings,
and worked in an open boiler room. The double air-tight casings were of stainless
steel, between which the combustion air was led to the burner registers.
![]() |
A piece of artwork painted during the 1991 Gulf War deployment, based on the equipment shown. |
![]() |
Looking between the two boilers. |
Each boiler operated at 550 lb/sq.in. and 850 deg.F, and heat from fuel combustion was transferred to the feed water in four ways:
· The heat of combustion of fuel in the furnace was transferred by radiation and conduction to the waterwalls of the furnace and the three rows of firerow tubes;
· By convection and conduction to the generator tubes known as the convection bank;
· By conduction and radiation to the steam in the five pass superheater;
· By conduction from the furnace gases that passed the regulating dampers, to heat the feed water in the economizer.
Each boiler was totally enclosed with its own forced draught
and ducting, and the boiler room itself was kept largely at atmospheric
pressure. There was a cross-over connection between the forced draught blowers,
in the form of a hand-operated damper fitted between the boiler casings of the
two boilers, such that either blower could provide air to both boilers (in case
of failure of one blower) under cruise and emergency conditions.
Boiler control was automatic to control steam temperatures
and drum level, with remote or manual control also provided. All other aspects
of boiler operation were manually controlled. A console was fitted just aft of
the boilers that incorporated the automatic and manual controls and all
indicators required for operation of the boilers.
A periscope type fitting was installed near the boiler room panel so that smoke conditions could be observed.
Engines
Each engine originally consisted of main and cruise turbines
(with the cruise turbine mounted separately outboard of the main turbine) and a
set of single helical, double reduction gearing (i.e. the gearbox). Each engine
was installed side-by-side in a single engine room. As noted above, the cruise
turbines were later removed or not installed in most ships. According to George
Webster and Ron Monette, HMCS ST. LAURENT retained the cruise turbines.
![]() |
Looking forward and to port at the top of HMCS Terra Nova's port turbine. |
From George Webster: "To start with, the cruise
turbines were fitted to one ship that I have personally seen and that was HMCS
St. Laurent. Apparently the clutch
arrangement was poorly designed and the cruise engine was rarely used. The cruise turbines were indeed fitted
outboard of the main engines and in the remaining ships of this type (Y-100
machinery), there is a wider than normal platform out board of the ahead main
turbine where the cruise turbine was originally supposed to have been
fitted. I can't recall how many cruise
turbines were actually fitted but they were all removed shortly after their
introduction."
![]() |
One of HMS Plymouth's turbines with an inspection plate removed, exposing the turbine blades. |
The main turbine drive was transmitted through a flexible
coupling to the gearing, and thence through a thrust block to the propeller
shaft. Power from the cruise turbine was transmitted via the automatic clutch
and a single reduction gear to a pinion driving the outboard main primary train
gearwheel and then to the propeller shaft, with a total triple speed reduction.
Each main engine set was designed to produce 15,000 shp
(30,000 shp combined) at 220 rpm when steaming ahead in the deep draught
condition, and 227 rpm in the light draught condition, with a seawater
temperature of 85 deg.F. and the ship 6 months out of dock. Each astern turbine
generated 5,000 shp.
Turbine |
Cruise
Turbine |
Main
Turbine |
Astern
Turbine |
No. of
Stages |
Curtis wheel
+ 8 impulse |
8 impulse
(by-pass into Stage 5 when cruising) |
Single Curtis
Wheel |
Mean
Diameter |
22" |
34" |
26" |
Weight
between centres |
1,800 lbs |
4,650 lbs |
-- |
Speed at
Maximum Power |
8,510 rpm
(light draught) |
5,750 rpm
(light draught) |
4,000 rpm
(5,000 shp) |
Critical
Speed |
11,760 rpm |
7,320 rpm |
-- |
The greater part of the machinery life is typically spent at
cruising speeds, and therefore the cruise turbine was designed to be
lightweight and highly efficient, to give good overall performance from 5% to
100% full power, and maximum efficiency between 5% and 30% full power. Maximum
efficiency was intended at 5% full power, which would have produced
approximately 12 knots.
The result of the above was improved thermal efficiency, due to advanced steam
conditions and overall improvement in turbine, condenser, and reduction gearing
design. Higher turbine speeds in concert with the double reduction gearing
permitted reduced blading diameters to obtain suitable peripheral speeds, and
the use of all-impulse blading reduced the number of stages required, thus
shortening the turbine rotor length. The incorporation of the condenser into
the main turbine casing saved space and weight.
Both the main and cruise turbines were controlled by a single throttle
hand-wheel throughout the entire power range, and power was transferred between
the two turbines by an automatic clutch and a manually operated nozzle control
valve mechanism. According to George Webster and Ron Monette, engaging the
astern turbine in ships with the cruise turbine fitted was apparently a
challenge, as the throttle watch keeper would have to close the cruise turbine
throttle then run back to the astern throttle to engage the astern turbine.
Presumably this became easier after the removal of the cruise turbine in most
ships.
When the cruise turbine was disengaged, a rolling steam supply (incorporated
into the first nozzle control valve) maintained the cruise turbine at 500 rpm
to prevent cylinder distortion and rotor hogging.
Power Transmission, Shafting, and Propellers
Power from the turbines was transmitted to the propeller shafts via a MAAG type
hardened and ground double reduction gearbox; the cruise turbine experienced
triple reduction. As noted above, the automatic clutch designed to transfer
power between the cruise and main turbines did not work properly, and the
cruise turbines were removed on most or all of the ships. The opening on the
gearbox originally intended to accept the shaft from the cruise turbine was
plated over after the cruise turbine was removed.
The hollow-bored propeller shaft passed through a watertight bulkhead gland at the aft end of the engine compartment and again in the Plummer Block compartment. Shaft bearings were located immediately forward of the glands. The tailshaft left the hull through a stern tube containing oil-lubricated bearings, and oil seals were fitted at both end of the stern tube to prevent oil and seawater leakage. The hollow bore of the shaft was plugged at both ends to prevent leakage in case the shaft broke. The propeller shaft could be locked by engaging the turning gear in the main gearing (as opposed to engaging a brake on the shaft itself in the Tribal Class). The turning gear was designed to withstand a shaft torque of 1/3 full power to permit a speed of approximately 17 knots. The application of full power on one engine with the other shaft locked was not recommended, but in emergency situations could be used to raise the ship's speed to 19 knots. Alternatively, the shaft could be trailed (allowed to freewheel) by uncoupling the shaft forward of the plummer and trailing block.
![]() |
The port gearbox in HMS Plymouth, presumably also with a cover over the quill shaft . |
The shafting and propellers were interchangeable with the RN's Type 12
frigates. The propellers were a conventional type of 12' diameter constructed
of high tensile manganese bronze, and were contra-rotating such that each shaft
rotated outboard when moving forward.
Survivability
Each boiler was designed as a single unit supported by the boiler feet. The
boiler feet hold-down bolts were designed to fracture before the feet
themselves if they were subjected to large underwater explosions. Either
forced-draught blower could be used to provide combustion air for both boilers.
Most machinery mountings were of the rigid-resilient type, where under severe
shock the mountings would collapse thus preventing damage to castings or bolts,
and the weight of the machinery would then be carried by resilient pads until
repairs could be made.
The main engines were designed to stay in operation even when submerged up to
the bottom of the lowest main turbine bearing.
Ship's Power
The first ships were fitted with two 400 kW turbo-generators (i.e. steam
generators), one each in the boiler (port after end) and engine (starboard
forward end) rooms; and three 200 kW diesel generators - one in the boiler
room, the other two on No.3 deck aft and No.4 deck forward.
![]() |
A diesel genset on TERRA NOVA, looking aft into the compartment on the starboard side of the ship. |
The turbo generators were the main source of power at sea, and were entirely
self contained units with their own condensers and pumps, all driven off the
turbine shaft.
Sources:
Barrie, Ron and Macpherson, Ken. (1996). Cadillac of Destroyers: HMCS
ST. LAURENT and Her Successors. Vanwell Publishing Ltd. St. Catherines,
Ont.
Steed, Roger G. (1999). Canadian Warships Since 1956. Vanwell
Publishing Ltd. St. Catherines, ON.
RCN Publication. (1968). Machinery Digest for Destroyer Escorts, 205,
206, 257 and Classes. Queen's Printer and Controller of Stationary,
Ottawa.
Conversation and correspondence with Jim Brewer, June 2006 to February 2007.
Conversations with Ron Monette, February and August 1999.
Correspondence with Dave Holmes, December 2006.
Correspondence with Dave Holmes, June 2007.
Correspondence with George Webster, December 2006 to February 2007.